18.3.3 Organizational maturity models

2025.10.06.
AI Security Blog

Individual certifications for red teamers and AI security professionals are fundamental building blocks. But a team of certified experts operating within a chaotic environment can only achieve so much. True resilience against sophisticated AI threats requires more than just skilled individuals; it demands a capable organization. This is the transition from asking “Are our people certified?” to “How mature are our processes for securing AI?”

An organizational maturity model provides the framework for answering that question. It’s a roadmap that helps you assess, measure, and improve your organization’s AI security capabilities systematically. Instead of treating AI red teaming as a series of isolated engagements, a maturity model helps you embed it into a repeatable, measurable, and continuously improving program.

Kapcsolati űrlap - EN

Do you have a question about AI Security? Reach out to us here:

Defining AI Security Maturity

An AI Security Maturity Model is a structured framework that describes the stages of evolution for an organization’s AI security program. It moves beyond simple binary checks (e.g., “Do we have a policy?”) to evaluate the quality, consistency, and integration of security practices. The core idea is that capabilities evolve through predictable stages, from ad-hoc and reactive to disciplined, proactive, and optimized.

By using a model, you gain several key advantages:

  • A Common Language: It provides a shared vocabulary for stakeholders across technical and business units to discuss AI security posture.
  • Benchmarking: You can objectively assess your current state against a defined standard, identifying strengths and critical gaps.
  • A Strategic Roadmap: It helps you define a realistic target state and build a prioritized plan to get there, ensuring resources are invested where they will have the most impact.
  • Demonstrable Progress: You can track improvements over time, providing clear metrics for leadership and compliance auditors.

The Five Levels of AI Red Teaming Maturity

Most maturity models, inspired by frameworks like the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI), use a five-level scale. As you ascend the levels, your processes become more standardized, integrated, and data-driven. Below is a visual representation of this progression.

1 Initial Ad-Hoc 2 Managed Project-Level 3 Defined Standardized 4 Managed Quantitative 5 Optimizing Continuous Increasing Process Maturity and Capability

Let’s examine what AI red teaming looks like at each of these levels, focusing on key organizational domains.

Domain AI Red Teaming Capability by Maturity Level
Level 1: Initial
(Chaotic / Ad-Hoc)
  • Governance: No formal AI security policy. Security is an afterthought.
  • Red Teaming: Performed rarely, if at all. Usually reactive, triggered by an incident or a customer request. Highly dependent on the skills of one or two individuals.
  • Tooling: No specialized tools. Red teamers use general-purpose pentesting tools with limited effectiveness against AI systems.
  • Integration: Findings are delivered in a static report and may or may not be actioned by development teams. No feedback loop.
Level 2: Managed
(Repeatable / Project-Level)
  • Governance: Basic AI security guidelines exist but are not enforced consistently across projects.
  • Red Teaming: Engagements are planned for high-risk projects. A basic methodology is followed, but it varies between teams. Success is still highly dependent on specific experts.
  • Tooling: Some open-source adversarial ML libraries (e.g., ART, Counterfit) are used experimentally.
  • Integration: Findings are tracked in a ticketing system. Remediation is inconsistent.
Level 3: Defined
(Standardized / Organizational)
  • Governance: An organization-wide AI security policy and standard are defined and mandated. Secure AI development training is provided.
  • Red Teaming: A standardized AI red teaming methodology, aligned with frameworks like MITRE ATLAS, is adopted across the organization. A dedicated team or function exists.
  • Tooling: A standard set of tools is used. The organization may be developing custom tools or platforms for automated testing.
  • Integration: Red teaming is a defined stage in the AI System Development Lifecycle (AI-SDLC). Findings are systematically tracked, and remediation is verified.
Level 4: Quantitatively Managed
(Measured / Data-Driven)
  • Governance: Policies are refined based on metrics. The effectiveness of security controls is measured.
  • Red Teaming: Key performance indicators (KPIs) are established for the red team (e.g., time-to-exploit, severity of findings, attack path coverage). The scope and depth of testing are determined by quantitative risk analysis.
  • Tooling: Automated adversarial testing is integrated into CI/CD pipelines. The results of these tools are correlated with manual red team findings.
  • Integration: Metrics from red team findings (e.g., vulnerability density, patch times) are used to measure and improve the security of the AI-SDLC.
Level 5: Optimizing
(Continuous Improvement)
  • Governance: The AI security program is proactive, adapting to emerging threats and new research. Lessons learned from incidents and red team exercises drive fundamental policy changes.
  • Red Teaming: The red team focuses on novel threat research and developing new attack techniques. “Purple teaming” is common, with red and blue teams collaborating to improve detection and response in real time.
  • Tooling: The organization contributes to open-source tools or develops cutting-edge platforms. AI is used to augment red teaming activities (e.g., automated vulnerability discovery).
  • Integration: The feedback loop is fully closed. Red team insights directly inform the design of next-generation models and defensive architectures.

Implementing a Maturity Model

Adopting a maturity model is a strategic initiative, not a one-time project. The process typically involves these steps:

  1. Select or Adapt a Model: You can adopt an existing model (like the BSIMM or OWASP SAMM, adapted for AI) or develop a custom one that reflects your organization’s specific context, threat landscape, and regulatory requirements.
  2. Conduct a Baseline Assessment: Use the model to perform an honest evaluation of your current practices. This involves reviewing documentation, interviewing key personnel (developers, security engineers, product managers), and examining past red team reports.
  3. Define a Target State: Not every organization needs to be at Level 5 in all domains. Based on your risk appetite and business goals, define a realistic target maturity level for each area. A customer-facing generative AI product likely requires a higher maturity than an internal-use predictive maintenance model.
  4. Develop a Phased Roadmap: Create a prioritized action plan to close the gaps between your current and target states. Focus on foundational improvements first—you can’t achieve quantitative management (Level 4) without defined processes (Level 3).
  5. Measure and Iterate: Periodically reassess your maturity to track progress, celebrate wins, and adjust the roadmap as the threat landscape and your organization evolve.

Ultimately, an organizational maturity model transforms AI red teaming from an isolated, tactical activity into a strategic capability. It provides the structure needed to build a resilient, adaptable, and defensible AI security program that can keep pace with the rapid evolution of both AI technology and the adversaries targeting it.