In conventional deep learning, your attack surface is primarily the data’s content—the pixel values in an image, the tokens in a text sequence. Neuromorphic systems force a fundamental shift in this thinking. Because these systems process asynchronous streams of events (spikes), the attack surface expands into a new dimension: time. The “when” becomes as exploitable as the “what.”
Manipulating the temporal dynamics of spike trains is the core of event-based attacks. You’re no longer just altering data points; you’re orchestrating a malicious symphony of timed events to fool, disable, or control the system.
The Temporal Attack Surface: Time as a Weapon
An SNN’s behavior is dictated by the precise timing and correlation of incoming spikes. Neurons integrate these spikes over time, and their membrane potential rises and falls accordingly. If the potential crosses a threshold, the neuron fires its own spike. This mechanism is ripe for exploitation. We can categorize the primary vectors based on how they manipulate this temporal process.
Spike Timing Manipulation (Temporal Poisoning)
This is one of the most subtle and powerful attacks against SNNs. By introducing minuscule delays or advances (on the order of microseconds) to specific spikes in an input stream, you can fundamentally alter the network’s computation. A spike arriving slightly later might fail to contribute to a neuron’s firing, effectively erasing the feature it represents. Conversely, advancing a spike could cause a neuron to fire prematurely, triggering a cascade of incorrect activations.
Spike Flooding and Starvation
These are resource-exhaustion attacks tailored for the event-based domain.
- Spike Flooding (Denial-of-Service): Every spike a neuromorphic chip processes consumes a small amount of energy and computational resources for synaptic updates. By bombarding a system with a high-frequency stream of spurious spikes, you can overwhelm its processing capacity. This can lead to increased latency, missed processing of legitimate spikes, and thermal throttling of the hardware. In effect, it’s a DoS attack at the neural level, blinding the system with noise.
- Spike Starvation (Evasion): The inverse of flooding, this attack involves selectively blocking or dropping critical spikes from the input stream. Imagine a neuromorphic camera where the edges of an object are encoded by a burst of spikes. An attacker who can intercept and filter the event stream could remove these specific spikes, effectively “erasing” the object from the SNN’s perception, causing a catastrophic failure in an autonomous vehicle or drone.
Crafting and Injecting Adversarial Events
Beyond manipulating existing event streams, you can generate entirely new, malicious ones. This is analogous to crafting an adversarial patch for a CNN, but instead of a pattern of pixels, you craft a pattern of timed spikes.
Adversarial Spike Injection
The goal here is to create a minimal, often imperceptible, stream of additional spikes that, when merged with the legitimate input, forces a misclassification. This requires knowledge of the SNN’s architecture and weights. You would solve an optimization problem to find the precise timings and locations for a few extra spikes that are most effective at pushing a target neuron (or population of neurons) over its firing threshold to trigger an incorrect outcome.
# Pseudocode for crafting an adversarial spike train function generate_adversarial_spikes(model, input_spikes, target_class): # Initialize a small, empty set of adversarial spikes adversarial_train = [] max_spikes = 5 // Constraint: keep the attack subtle for i in range(max_spikes): # Calculate the gradient of the loss w.r.t. spike timing # to find the most impactful time and neuron to add a spike loss = calculate_loss(model, input_spikes + adversarial_train, target_class) gradients = loss.backward() // Gradient w.r.t. spike times # Find the best (neuron_id, time_t) to add a new spike best_new_spike = find_optimal_spike_addition(gradients) # Add the crafted spike to our malicious payload adversarial_train.append(best_new_spike) return adversarial_train
Comparative Analysis: Classic vs. Neuromorphic Vectors
To help you map your existing red teaming knowledge, this table contrasts traditional ML attacks with their neuromorphic counterparts.
| Attack Goal | Classic ML Vector (e.g., on CNNs) | Neuromorphic Vector (on SNNs) |
|---|---|---|
| Evasion (Misclassification at inference) |
Adding small, calculated pixel perturbations (e.g., FGSM). Adversarial patches. | Spike Timing Manipulation. Adversarial Spike Injection. Spike Starvation to remove features. |
| Poisoning (Corrupting the training process) |
Injecting mislabeled examples into the training dataset. Backdoor triggers. | Injecting data with malicious temporal correlations. Training a model to over-rely on specific spike timings that can be triggered later. |
| Denial of Service (Making the model unavailable) |
Sending malformed or computationally expensive inputs to an API endpoint. | Spike Flooding to overwhelm hardware resources, increase latency, and drain power. |
Attack Scenario: Hijacking a Drone with a Laser Pointer
Target: An autonomous drone using a neuromorphic event-based camera for obstacle avoidance in a warehouse.
Objective: Force the drone to misidentify a solid wall as an open path, causing a collision.
- Reconnaissance: The attacker first analyzes the drone’s sensor output (or a similar model) to learn the spike patterns corresponding to “wall” versus “open space.” They discover that a dense, vertically correlated set of spikes signifies a wall.
- Weaponization: The attacker crafts an “anti-wall” spike pattern. This pattern consists of two parts:
- Suppression: A pattern designed to introduce refractory periods in the neurons that would normally detect the wall.
- Injection: A sparse, carefully timed pattern that mimics the signature of open space.
- Delivery: The attacker uses a low-power, rapidly modulated laser pointer. By shining this laser at the drone’s event-based camera, they can “paint” the adversarial event pattern directly onto its sensor. The sensor faithfully translates the flickering light into the malicious spike train.
- Exploitation: The drone’s SNN receives a merged stream of events: the real events from the wall and the fake events from the laser. The adversarial spikes are timed to arrive just before the real ones, causing the “wall” neurons to fire and enter a refractory period, making them unable to fire again when the legitimate wall spikes arrive. The injected “open space” pattern is then processed, leading the SNN to classify the area as navigable. The drone’s flight controller receives the “all clear” and pilots it directly into the wall.