23.1.5 Version tracking and updates

2025.10.06.
AI Security Blog

The open-source tools you rely on for AI red teaming are not static artifacts. They are active projects, evolving rapidly to counter new defenses, support new models, and patch their own vulnerabilities. Neglecting version control and updates is akin to using an outdated virus scanner—you create blind spots in your own security posture and limit your offensive capabilities.

The Imperative for Vigilant Versioning

Staying current is more than just accessing the latest features. It’s a fundamental aspect of operational security and effectiveness. There are three primary drivers for maintaining a rigorous update discipline:

Kapcsolati űrlap - EN

Do you have a question about AI Security? Reach out to us here:

  • Security Patches: The tools you use to find vulnerabilities can have vulnerabilities themselves. A popular adversarial attack library could have a flaw allowing for remote code execution or data leakage. Developers actively patch these, but you are only protected if you apply the update.
  • Capability Enhancements: The AI security landscape moves at a breakneck pace. A tool update might introduce a novel evasion technique, add support for a new LLM provider’s API, or significantly improve the performance of a model extraction attack. An outdated tool means you are fighting today’s battles with yesterday’s weapons.
  • Dependency Health: Your red teaming tools depend on a complex tree of other libraries (e.g., tensorflow, torch, numpy, requests). An update to your primary tool often includes crucial updates to these dependencies, patching vulnerabilities you might not even be aware of.

A Practical Update Workflow

Ad-hoc updates can introduce instability. A structured process minimizes risk and ensures your toolkit remains reliable. The core principle is to verify before you trust. An update, especially a major one, should be treated as a new piece of software that requires validation before being deployed in a critical engagement.

Tool Update Decision Workflow New VersionAvailable Review Changelog& Release Notes Test in StagingEnvironment Deploy toProduction MAJOR version?High risk. Allocatesignificant test time. MINOR version?Medium risk. Verify keyscripts and functions. PATCH version?Low risk. Focus onsecurity fixes.

Identifying Outdated Tools

Most package managers provide built-in commands to check for outdated dependencies. For Python-based tools installed via pip, you can quickly get a list of packages that have newer versions available.

# Activate your project's virtual environment first
# pip list --outdated

# Example output:
Package             Version Latest Type
------------------- ------- ------ -----
adversarial-robustness-toolbox 1.15.0  1.16.1 wheel
textattack          0.3.8   0.3.9  wheel
mitmproxy           9.0.1   10.1.6 wheel

This simple command immediately flags that your versions of ART, TextAttack, and mitmproxy are behind the latest releases, prompting you to investigate the updates.

Understanding Semantic Versioning

Most projects follow Semantic Versioning (SemVer), a simple standard for version numbers formatted as MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH (e.g., 1.16.1). Understanding this is key to assessing update risk:

  • PATCH (1.16.0 -> 1.16.1): Backwards-compatible bug fixes and security patches. These are generally safe to apply immediately.
  • MINOR (1.15.0 -> 1.16.0): New functionality added in a backwards-compatible manner. Requires testing to ensure new features don’t interfere with existing workflows.
  • MAJOR (1.15.0 -> 2.0.0): Incompatible API changes. This is a high-risk update that will likely break your existing scripts and require significant effort to migrate.

Dependency Management and Reproducibility

Your toolkit’s reliability depends on having a consistent environment. Simply running pip install <tool> can produce different results from one day to the next as dependencies are updated.

To ensure reproducibility, always use dependency lock files. For Python projects, this means generating a requirements.txt file with specific versions:

# Generate a lock file with exact versions
pip freeze > requirements.txt

# Later, to recreate the exact environment on another machine
pip install -r requirements.txt

When you decide to update a tool, you should update it in your staging environment, run your validation tests, and then regenerate the lock file. This captures the new, verified state of your toolkit, ensuring that every team member is using the exact same set of tools and dependencies.

Balancing Stability and Capability

There is an inherent tension between using the most cutting-edge version of a tool and maintaining a stable, predictable environment. A good strategy is to pin your production environment to a known-good, recent version while allowing for experimentation with newer versions in a separate research or staging environment. This lets you benefit from stability during engagements while still evaluating the latest adversarial techniques as they become available.