Moving beyond individual robustness algorithms requires a systematic way to execute, measure, and compare them. Manually running dozens of test configurations across multiple models is inefficient, error-prone, and unsustainable. A benchmark runner framework provides the necessary structure to automate this process, ensuring reproducibility and scalability for your red teaming evaluations.
The Need for a Standardized Executor
As you expand your security testing, you’ll face a combinatorial explosion of variables: models, datasets, attack methods, and evaluation metrics. A dedicated runner framework addresses this complexity by decoupling the components of an evaluation. It acts as an orchestrator, allowing you to define experiments in a declarative way (e.g., in a configuration file) and then executes them consistently.
The core benefits include:
- Reproducibility: Every test run is based on a version-controlled configuration file, eliminating “it worked on my machine” issues.
- Scalability: Easily add new models, datasets, or attack algorithms without rewriting the core execution logic.
- Efficiency: Automate the entire pipeline from data loading to report generation, freeing up your team to focus on analysis rather than manual execution.
- Comparability: Ensures that all tests are run under the same conditions, making cross-model or cross-attack comparisons valid.
Architectural Overview
A well-designed benchmark runner is modular. It treats models, datasets, attacks, and metrics as pluggable components. The framework’s job is to wire these components together based on a user-defined configuration and manage the execution flow.
Defining Experiments with Configuration
The entry point for any benchmark run is a configuration file. This file explicitly defines what to test and how. Using a human-readable format like YAML is highly recommended. It allows you to define the matrix of tests without touching the runner’s code.
Example `config.yaml`
# config.yaml: Defines the benchmarking tasks
# List of models to evaluate
models:
- name: 'sentiment-distilbert-v1'
path: './models/distilbert'
type: 'text-classification'
- name: 'toxic-comment-roberta-v2'
path: 'hf-hub/roberta-base-toxic'
type: 'text-classification'
# List of datasets to use for evaluation
datasets:
- name: 'imdb-test-sample'
path: './data/imdb_test_100.csv'
label_column: 'sentiment'
# List of attacks and their parameters
attacks:
- name: 'TextFooler'
module: 'attacks.text.textfooler'
params:
max_candidates: 50
- name: 'DeepWordBug'
module: 'attacks.text.deepwordbug'
params:
scorer: 'char_swap'
# Metrics to compute for each run
metrics:
- 'accuracy'
- 'attack_success_rate'
- 'query_count'
Implementation Sketch
The runner itself can be implemented as a class in a language like Python. Its primary role is to parse the configuration, instantiate the necessary objects (models, attacks), and loop through the defined experiments, collecting results along the way.
# pseudocode/python for a simple benchmark runner
import yaml
class BenchmarkRunner:
def __init__(self, config_path):
# 1. Load and parse the configuration file
with open(config_path, 'r') as f:
self.config = yaml.safe_load(f)
self.results = []
def run(self):
# 2. Iterate through each combination of model, dataset, and attack
for model_conf in self.config['models']:
model = self.load_model(model_conf)
for dataset_conf in self.config['datasets']:
dataset = self.load_dataset(dataset_conf)
for attack_conf in self.config['attacks']:
attack = self.load_attack(attack_conf)
# 3. Execute the test
print(f"Running {attack.name} on {model.name}...")
raw_results = self.execute_test(model, dataset, attack)
# 4. Compute metrics and store them
metrics = self.compute_metrics(raw_results, self.config['metrics'])
self.results.append(metrics)
def generate_report(self):
# 5. Aggregate all results into a final report (e.g., CSV, JSON)
print("Generating final report...")
# ... logic to save self.results to a file ...
# Usage:
# runner = BenchmarkRunner('config.yaml')
# runner.run()
# runner.generate_report()
In this sketch, methods like load_model, load_dataset, and load_attack would contain the logic to dynamically import and instantiate the correct classes based on the configuration strings. The execute_test method would contain the core loop that feeds data samples to the attack algorithm, which in turn queries the model.
Key Component Responsibilities
| Component | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Configuration Parser | Reads YAML/JSON file and provides a structured representation (e.g., a dictionary) of the experiments to run. |
| Resource Loaders | Dynamically instantiates model, dataset, and attack objects based on configuration. Handles loading weights, data files, etc. |
| Test Executor | Orchestrates a single test run. Iterates over the dataset, applies the attack, gets model predictions, and collects raw outputs. |
| Metrics Calculator | Takes raw outputs from the executor and computes summary statistics like accuracy, attack success rate, or perturbation levels. |
| Report Generator | Aggregates metrics from all test runs and formats them into a human-readable and machine-parsable report (e.g., CSV, markdown table, JSON). |
Building or adopting a benchmark runner framework is a critical step in maturing your AI red teaming capabilities. It moves your operations from ad-hoc scripts to a systematic, repeatable, and scalable evaluation process, which is essential for tracking security posture over time and comparing defenses effectively.