26.4.3 Automatic report generators

2025.10.06.
AI Security Blog

The output of a comprehensive batch testing system is a flood of raw data: logs, metrics, pass/fail statuses, and system responses. This data, in its raw form, is noise. An automatic report generator is the critical component that transforms this noise into a coherent signal, translating technical findings into actionable intelligence for diverse stakeholders.

From Data Points to Narrative

A successful AI red team operation doesn’t end with a successful exploit; it ends with driving organizational change. Reports are the primary vehicle for this change. Automating their generation ensures consistency, scalability, and timeliness, freeing up operators to focus on novel threat discovery rather than documentation.

Kapcsolati űrlap - EN

Do you have a question about AI Security? Reach out to us here:

Effective report generators are more than just script-driven data dumps. They are sophisticated systems designed to ingest, analyze, and present findings in a context-aware manner. The core function is to build a narrative of risk that resonates with everyone from the C-suite to the individual ML engineer.

Automated Reporting Pipeline Raw Test Logs (JSON, CSV) Ingestion & Aggregation Risk Scoring & Prioritization Templating & Visualization Actionable Reports (PDF, HTML, Dashboard)

Key Components of a Report Generator

A robust generator should be modular, allowing you to tailor its output. Consider these essential components:

1. Data Ingestion and Parsing

The foundation of any report is clean, structured data. The generator must be able to consume outputs from various testing tools. Standardized formats like JSON are ideal. The parser’s role is to extract critical information: which test was run, against which model endpoint, the payload used, the observed outcome, and any relevant metadata (e.g., timestamps, test harness version).

2. Aggregation and Correlation

This module moves beyond individual data points. It should group related findings. For example, it could identify that 15 different prompt injection payloads all succeeded by exploiting the same underlying system instruction flaw. Correlation helps identify systemic weaknesses rather than just isolated bugs. It answers questions like, “Does this model consistently fail against jailbreaks but resist data extraction?”

3. Templating Engine

One size does not fit all. Different audiences require vastly different levels of detail. A templating engine (like Jinja2 in Python or Handlebars in JavaScript) is non-negotiable. It allows you to create multiple report formats from the same underlying data set.

Audience Content Focus Format
Executive (CISO, VP) Risk posture, KPIs, trend analysis, high-impact findings. 1-page PDF summary, interactive dashboard.
Product Manager Impact on user experience, feature-specific vulnerabilities. HTML report with links to failing test cases.
ML Engineer / Developer Full technical details, payloads, logs, stack traces, reproduction steps. Markdown file, direct integration with Jira/ticketing system.

4. Visualization and Metrics

Humans process visual information far more efficiently than raw numbers. The generator should integrate a visualization library (e.g., D3.js, Matplotlib, Plotly) to create charts and graphs. Key metrics to visualize include:

  • Vulnerability Breakdown: A pie or bar chart showing the distribution of findings by category (e.g., Prompt Injection, Denial of Service, PII Leakage).
  • Trend Analysis: A line graph showing the number of critical vulnerabilities found over time, tracking progress.
  • Model Comparison: A heatmap comparing the performance of different models against a standard set of attacks.

Implementation Snippet: Python with Jinja2

Here is a simplified example demonstrating how you might use Python to process test results and render them into an HTML report using the Jinja2 templating library. This illustrates the core logic of separating data processing from presentation.

# report_generator.py
import json
from jinja2 import Environment, FileSystemLoader

# 1. Load and process raw test data
with open('test_results.json', 'r') as f:
    results = json.load(f)

summary = {
    'total_tests': len(results),
    'passed': sum(1 for r in results if r['status'] == 'passed'),
    'failed': sum(1 for r in results if r['status'] == 'failed'),
    'critical_fails': [r for r in results if r.get('severity') == 'critical']
}

# 2. Set up the Jinja2 templating environment
env = Environment(loader=FileSystemLoader('.'))
template = env.get_template('report_template.html')

# 3. Render the report by passing data to the template
html_output = template.render(summary=summary)

with open('security_report.html', 'w') as f:
    f.write(html_output)

The corresponding report_template.html would contain placeholders like {{ summary.failed }} which are filled in when the script runs.

Adversarial Mindset: Attacking the Report

As a red teamer, you must also consider how the reporting pipeline itself can be a target or a source of deception. Ask these questions:

  • Can the input be poisoned? If an attacker can manipulate the test logs before they are ingested, they could hide a critical vulnerability, making it appear as a “pass” in the final report.
  • Is the “green dashboard” lying? High pass rates can create a dangerous sense of security. Are the tests comprehensive, or are they simply missing novel or sophisticated attacks? An automated report can amplify this false confidence.
  • Does automation obscure context? A generator might correctly flag a data leakage vulnerability but miss the subtle business context that makes it a company-ending event. Human oversight remains essential for interpreting the results.

Ultimately, an automatic report generator is a powerful force multiplier. It takes the raw output from batch testing systems and prepares it for consumption by scheduled audit runners and human decision-makers, ensuring that your red teaming efforts translate into tangible security improvements.